Fair Trade Investing

Even the best professional investors find it very hard to beat the stock market when they're doing well. In fact, over 10-year periods, only a few percent of all money managers actually beat the market. And that market-beating includes investing in sin. That is, things like tobacco and oil and porn (Facebook, Google, Snap, etc.).

So when would-be do-gooders then layer on incremental friction in wanting those investors to only invest in "fair trade" companies, they are essentially donating investment returns to "fair trade" practices. That is, an unfair trade coffee picker pays market wages or whatever price it will take to get workers to show up, pick coffee beans, and load them in trucks. But fair trade coffee pickers are essentially an emerging market union where fair trade practices guarantee a kind of minimium wage to those workers.

Historically, fair trade companies perform a lot worse than those companies that ruthlessly seek profits. Treating people well is, of course, the right thing to do. But the question revolves around who should pay the extra money for fair trade investing v. just normal investing to win a profit.

Got any ideas? Tell us about it.

Related or Semi-related Video

Econ: What is The Firm?5 Views

00:00

And finance Allah shmoop What is the firm Shmoop economic

00:07

theory of the firm says that firms are firm about

00:11

one thing Profit maximization The big PM means getting revenues

00:16

as high as possible and costs as low as possible

00:19

And that whole rationale is the reason firms will keep

00:22

producing until their last unit of production is where marginal

00:26

costs equal marginal revenue if they produce less than this

00:30

amount while they're missing out on some profit if they

00:32

produce Mohr than this amount while they be losing money

00:35

In theory firms are incentivized to produce produce produce until

00:39

profit is maximized The yin and the yang of the

00:42

firm is consumers Consumers want to maximize their utility I'ii

00:47

get the most bang for their buck Firms and consumers

00:50

do the cha cha cha ching dance creating the economy

00:54

as we know it Yeah but what about philanthropic firms

00:57

firms that will care about more than maximizing profits with

01:00

the globe getting warmer and animal rights movements picking up

01:03

steam and environmental problems costing Well uh you know problems

01:07

and with the Internet and the media making everyone intensely

01:10

aware of these issues while suddenly people want firms to

01:13

do something about it Well In response some firms have

01:16

integrated these consumer demands into their marketing in products to

01:19

keep those profits rolling in buying just coffee No How

01:23

about Fair Trade Coffee Fair trade Coffee is an example

01:28

of the way in which firms differentiate themselves by differentiating

01:33

their products Some consumers would rather pay for this differentiated

01:37

do gooder product Mohr Expensive Fair trade Coffee over less

01:42

expensive normal coffee firms can capture their own market share

01:46

through product differentiation if consumers are willing to pay for

01:49

it And in this case they basically are using remote

01:52

union labor inside of emerging market countries and kind of

01:56

donating a dollar a pound or so so those workers

01:59

can what it called Oh yeah eat So with regulatory

02:02

policy or marketing or using quote philanthropy unquote to market

02:06

products Regardless normal firm's capital market capitalist firms are in

02:11

the game of maximizing profits The better consumers feel about

02:14

buying something well the more they will consume usually and

02:17

the more profits and given company will make But consumers

02:20

aren't the only ones making the decisions behind the scenes

02:23

The true kings and queens of firms are these shareholders

02:25

that common shareholders the people who own the stock and

02:29

elect the board of directors who then hires the CEO

02:32

who hires everyone else right The directors of firms are

02:35

the ones doing the managing but the shareholders are the

02:37

ones pulling the purse strings right They vote with their

02:40

dollars The shareholders at different firms have different privileges but

02:43

in general shareholders are considered Company owners leased the common

02:46

shareholders and they usually elect people to run the show

02:50

in the way they want it run which is almost

02:52

always to maximize dollars while firms were shaped by both

02:55

shareholders and consumer demand there also the interface between micro

02:59

economics and macro economics on the micro scale While we

03:02

look at how firms make decisions and why they make

03:05

the decisions they make what about hiring decisions and pricing

03:08

decisions Well on the macro scale economists are looking at

03:11

aggregate trends in firms such as unemployment rates turnover rates

03:15

investment you know things that all add up to impact

03:18

overall economic growth in or GDP yeah in the US

03:21

Those numbers affect monetary policy like think the Federal Reserve

03:24

and changing interest rates and fiscal policy think changes in

03:28

government spending in taxes via Congress and the press Will

03:31

firms are really just in the middle of it all

03:33

Profits consumer of shareholders governments and competing firms Regardless of

03:37

what Luda and Feral say the firms are the true 00:03:41.28 --> [endTime] moneymakers

Find other enlightening terms in Shmoop Finance Genius Bar(f)